|
|
KACHA PUKA, Pakistan – Two burqa-clad suicide bombers attacked people who had fled a Pakistani offensive against the Taliban close to the Afghan border, killing 41 as they lined up Saturday to register for food and other relief supplies.
The victims were among around 200,000 people to have left Orakzai since the end of last year, when the Pakistan army began offensive ground and air operations against militants based in the remote, tribally administered region.
The registration point in Kohat region was managed by the local administration, but sometimes used by foreign humanitarian groups, including the World Food Program, to deliver aid. There was no claim of responsibility, which is not unusual when bomb attacks kill ordinary Pakistani citizens.
The United Nations said it was temporarily suspending work helping displaced people in Kohat and neighboring Hangu as a result of the attack.
Al-Qaida and Taliban militants based in the northwest have carried out near-daily attacks over the last 18 months in Pakistan, seeking to overthrow its Western-allied government and stop it from fighting them. The blasts have killed several thousand people, but not deterred the army.
Most of the attacks are directed at security or government installations, but civilian targets have also been hit.
The registration point — essentially a small building in a dusty field — may have been hit to persuade people not to have any contact with the local administration or foreign relief groups.
The bombers were disguised in burqas, the all-encompassing veil worn by conservative Muslim women in parts of Afghanistan and Pakistan, allowing them to get close to the building without arousing suspicion, said police officer Abdullah Khan.
via Pakistan: Bombers kill refugees waiting for food – Yahoo! News.
written by Eee Zee
This is very interesting and we all need to read it from start to finish and send it on to anyone who will read it. Maybe this is why our American Muslims are so quiet and not speaking out about any atrocities. Can a good Muslim be a good American? This question was forwarded to a friend who worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years. The following is his reply:
Theologically – no … Because his allegiance is to Allah, The moon God of Arabia.
Religiously – no … Because no other religion is accepted by His Allah except Islam (Quran, 2:256)
Scripturally – no … Because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Islam and the Quran.
Geographically – no … Because his allegiance is to Mecca, to which he turns in prayer five times a day.
Socially – no . . . Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews.
Politically – no … Because he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and destruction of America, the great Satan.
Domestically – no … Because he is instructed to marry four Women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34).
Intellectually – no … Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt.
Philosophically – no … Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran do not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic.
Spiritually – no … Because when we declare ‘one nation under God,’ the Christian’s God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as Heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in The Quran’s 99 excellent names.
Therefore, after much study and deliberation … Perhaps we should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country. They obviously cannot be both “good” Muslims and good Americans. Call it what you wish, it’s still the truth. You had better believe it. The more who understand this, the better it will be for our country and our future. The religious war is bigger than we know or understand.
Can a Muslim be a good soldier? Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, opened fire at Ft. Hood and Killed 13. He is a good Muslim!
Footnote: The Muslims have said they will destroy us from within. SO FREEDOM IS NOT FREE. THE MARINES WANT THIS TO ROLL ALL OVER THE U.S. An Unguarded Strength is a double weakness. “Small God – big problems. Big God – small problems”. Greg Laurie “Evil prevails when good men do nothing”. Thoughts?
written by Eee Zee
Changes on the Continent cloud our future “The Europe as you know it from visiting, from your parents or friends is on the verge of collapsing,” Geert Wilders said in a speech in the United States last year.The leader of the Netherlands’ populist Party for Freedom added: “We are now witnessing profound changes that will forever alter Europe’s destiny and might send the Continent in what Ronald Reagan called ‘a thousand years of darkness.’” And not just Europe, but America as well.Been to Europe lately? Thought it was bad? You ain’t seen nothing yet. The passage of the Lisbon Treaty, hailed by President Obama, nailed the coffin shut on national sovereignty in Europe. The people of Europe fought it, but were overwhelmed by their political elites and the lack of American leadership in this age of our rather Marxist, collectivist U.S. president. Come Jan. 1, 2010, a disastrous and suicidal pact called the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership (Europe/Mediterranean) goes into effect with little fanfare or examination. It boggles the mind that such a consequential and seismic cultural shift could be mandated and put into play without so much as a murmur from the mainstream media. Why should Americans care about this?
Americans have to care because this global gobbledygook is coming to our shores, thanks to our globalist president. The European human rights group called Stop the Islamization of Europe (SIOE) has been working tirelessly to expose the mass Muslim immigration plan of the Euro-Med Partnership. A statement on the SIOE Web site criticizes the secrecy of the process: “It was shocking to hear about the plans and at the same time knowing that Danish politicians and a [cowardly] Danish press – who is otherwise proud to be critical – has told nothing to the Danish people about this project which begins in January. This also showed clearly at the conference. Only very few politicians showed up and no media. Those politicians who showed up had obviously never heard about the Euro-Mediterranean project.
The goal of the Euro-Mediterranean cooperation is to create a new Greater European Union encompassing both Europe and North Africa, with the Mediterranean Sea becoming a domestic Eurabian sea. The goal is to establish a “comprehensive political partnership,” including a “free trade area and economic integration”; “considerably more money for the partners” (that is, more European money flowing into North Africa); and “cultural partnership” – that is, importation of Islamic culture into post-Christian Europe. According to the SIOE, in the Euro-Med plan “Europe is to be islamized. Democracy, Christianity, European culture and Europeans are to be driven out of Europe.
Fifty million North Africans from Muslim countries are to be imported into the EU.” Skeptical? It’s already happening. The British newspaper the Daily Express reported in October 2008 on “a controversial taxpayer-funded ‘job centre’ ” that opened in Mali at that time as “just the first step towards promoting ‘free movement of people in Africa and the EU.’ Brussels economists claim Britain and other EU states will ‘need’ 56 million immigrant workers between them by 2050 to make up for the ‘demographic decline’ due to falling birthrates and rising death rates across Europe.” To offset this decline, a “blue card” system is to be created that will allow card holders to travel freely within the European Union and have full rights to work – as well as the full right to collect welfare benefits. A Muslim population from Africa moving freely into Europe threatens America. On Christmas Day, a Nigerian Muslim flew from Amsterdam to Detroit and tried to explode a bomb on the plane – after he was allowed to board the plane without a passport.
The Euro-Mediterranean Partnership will make jihad attacks like this one all the easier. And once in Europe, Muslims have already begun demanding special privileges and accommodations. IslamOnline reported on Dec. 21 that “Muslims activists from 26 European countries have come together to launch the first rights council to enlighten European Muslims about their rights, monitor rising Islamophobia and defend Muslim rights in European courts of law.” Ali Abu Shwaima, a Muslim leader in Italy, explained: “We think European human rights groups are not doing enough to defend the rights of Muslims. Therefore we thought that we need this new council, especially that all laws and constitutions in Europe respect freedom of religion and oppose all forms of discrimination and racism.” “Islamophobia,” “discrimination” and “racism” are all terms Muslims in Europe and America use to confuse people into thinking that the perpetrators of Islamic terrorism are the real victims. And it is working: Mr. Wilders is going on trial in the Netherlands, instead of all the Islamic hate sponsors he is fighting against. It has to be this way, to increase harmony among the Muslim and non-Muslim member states of the Euro-Med Partnership. This internationalism is already destroying what has made Europe free and great. And now Mr. Obama seems to want to do the same to America.
written by Eee Zee
It’s a strange paradox that, now that Britain is tied to France in the Republican marriage that is the EU, we’re less interested than ever in what happens next door (with the exception of stories that involve Carla Bruni and Nicolas Sarkozy, or for that matter any adultery-related gossip that reminds us Brits just how sexually inadequate we are).
Which is a shame, because France is the future, and I mean that in the worst possible way. Mark Steyn might have been exaggerating when he said that France will be the world’s third Islamic nuclear power, but I’m certainly not sure whether I should bother teaching my kids French, or if Arabic may be more handy on their trips across the channel.
But if Steyn’s prediction does turn out to be true it will be because of the French habit of sticking their heads in the sand. France was, after all, the first country in Western Europe to ban opinions when it passed its ridiculous Holocaust Denial law, which set the ball rolling for restrictions on free speech across Europe. And laws once used against Nazi-loving cranks are now used to criticise any opponents of mass immigration.
This is a country that, as anyone who’s visited its seedy cities in recent years can testify, has undergone enormous immigration from North and sub-Saharan Africa, and not all of it has been “enriching”. Not that we can know exactly what the downsides are, because France bans statistics on ethnicity and crime.
Now a French journalist called Éric Zemmour is being tormented by the establishment in a sinister witch-hunt for speaking the truth. On March 6 Zemmour said on a Canal+ talkshow, Salut les terriens, that “French immigrants were more closely monitored than other Frenchmen because most of the drug traffickers were black or Arab… It’s a fact.”
We don’t know for sure whether this is a fact because official statistics are, of course, impossible to find, but there are various studies that suggest that what Zemmour said is broadly true – the nature of the prison population, for example. However, a few days later the International League against Racism and Anti-Semitism (LICRA) announced it would take action against him – strange, since Zemmour is Jewish and from a Berber family himself, and certainly does not come from the Catholic-fascist de Maistre tradition of French politics.
The following week, MRAP (Movement Against Racism and for Friendship between Peoples, a Communist Resistance group which has morphed into a familiar-sounding “anti-racism” body) and the Club Averroès, which “defends diversity in the media”, took their case to the CSA, the TV regulation authorities, because Zemmour’s remarks “have racist tones.”
And on March 17, CRAN (Representative Council of Black Associations)) announced that it had protested to the CSA, and to France Télévisions, concerning remarks by Zemmour that he considers discrimination in hiring practices to be a “right”. On that day SOS-Racism, yet another anti-racism group, also lodged a complaint for “racial defamation” against Zemmour’s drug dealer comments, summoning him to appear before a criminal court.
The group said: “Éric Zemmour has been spreading his disgusting ideology on popular television programs for too long. He will have to answer for his statements before the judge.” Scared by all this controversy, Zemmour was sacked by his main employers, the Right-wing newspaper, Le Figaro, who then relented after an internet campaign and 100-strong demonstration outside their office.
It’s all very strange. Zemmour is not a “racist’, rather he’s an integrationist who thinks immigration has gone too far – but he’s come up against a political establishment that increasingly uses the law to enforce the popularity of its utopian vision. They’re determined to make Europe a carnival of cultures and anyone seen not enjoying themselves will be arrested.
And it will affect all of Europe, because in the area of state tyranny, when France sneezes, England soon catches un rhume.
Hat-tips: Galliawatch and Gates of Vienna.
written by Eee Zee
Robert Krentz was murdered while tending to his Arizona ranch last weekend and local police suspect an illegal alien is responsible. (Fox News, March 30, 2010). The 58 year-old rancher was gunned down on his own property shortly after radioing his brother Phil that he had encountered an illegal alien.
When Krentz didn’t show up to meet his brother about an hour later as planned, Phil called the police and a search party was formed. Late that night, Krentz was found slumped over his ATV, shot to death along with his dog. Law enforcement officials with tracker dogs followed the footprints from the crime scene on Krentz’s ranch 15 miles to the border where they crossed into Mexico.
The prominent rancher, who often brought water to illegal aliens and helped those who were injured, was apparently caught by surprise, as his ATV’s engine and lights were still on and he did not use either of the two guns he was carrying with him. (Fox News, March 30, 2010). Police believe that he could have been attacked by a drug cartel scout or a member of a band of thieves that has been terrorizing ranches in the area. It is also possible that Krentz’s murder was a retaliatory killing because just one day before, his brother stopped a caravan of illegal aliens who were carrying 280 pounds of marijuana. Id. Border patrol arrested all eight illegal aliens and impounded the drugs.
Whatever the motive behind the slaying of this innocent man, neighboring ranchers are both scared and frustrated with the lack of government action to secure the border. Friends and neighbors of the slain rancher denounced politicians for their empty promises to secure the border that failed to protect Krentz on his own land. (The Arizona Republic, April 1, 2010). The Krentz family issued a statement urging President Obama to deploy U.S. military personnel to the U.S.-Mexican border, but this is not the first time they have sought help from their elected officials. The family repeatedly expressed concern to authorities over the $6.2 million damage to their property and livestock caused by “illegal foot traffic,” and Robert’s wife, Susan, wrote to Congress in 2007 that “We are in fear for our lives and safety and health of ourselves and that of our families and friends.” (Fox News, March 30, 2010).
Lawmakers from Arizona and New Mexico are joining their constituents’ demands that the Obama administration deploy hundreds of National Guard and Border Patrol agents to the southern border. (Fox News, March 30, 2010). In the wake of the murder, state and federal politicians are calling upon the government to beef up border security and protect American citizens. Former Congressman J.D. Hayworth, who is currently challenging Senator John McCain’s bid for reelection, said that the killing debunks claims that the border is secure, “To put it diplomatically, that’s incorrect. To put it realistically, that’s a lie.” (The Arizona Republic, April 1, 2010).
Senator McCain also called upon the federal government to immediately deploy the National Guard to the border in a letter to Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano, who made a similar request to President George W. Bush in 2006 when she was the governor of Arizona. McCain urged, “I hope that you will take a personal interest in ensuring that Arizonans can feel safe and protected on their own property and not live in fear of the increasing violence along the border.” (CBS News, March 30, 2010). Arizona Governor Jan Brewer, whose request for National Guard troops last year was denied by the Obama administration, joined the demand for deployments, calling the killing a “horrible and unnecessary tragedy.” (Fox News, March 30, 2010). (Politico, April 2, 2010). President Obama has not responded to the renewed requests for increased border security, but just last month he spoke to reporters about the issue of National Guard deployments. (Id.) Obama has made it clear that he does not want to “militarize” the border, but he called it “unacceptable if you’ve got drug gangs crossing our borders and killing our citizens.” .
written by Eee Zee
The release of internal documents last week revealed that ICE officials recently set quotas to deport more illegal aliens in 2010 than the previous year. (The Washington Post, March 27, 2010). As the Immigration Customs and Enforcement (ICE) spokesman is scrambling to distance the agency from the content of the documents, amnesty forces are decrying the apparent move to enforce immigration laws, what they call a betrayal. The special interest groups are in an uproar because the memos from January and February of this year indicate that U.S. immigration authorities are both seeking to reverse a severe drop in deportations, and to do so are moving away from the Obama administration’s public pledge to focus enforcement efforts solely on violent criminal illegal aliens. (ICE Memos).
The internal memos have stirred controversy among opposition groups because they suggest a deviation from the public commitments made by Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano and ICE chief John T. Morton. Over the past year, Napolitano has expressed a determination to abandon the worksite enforcement actions and neighborhood sweeps the Bush administration focused on, and instead vocally supported the deportation of criminal aliens. (The Washington Post, March 27, 2010). However, in a February 22, 2010 memo authored by Jim Chaparro, head of ICE detention and removal operations (DRO), the senior official noted that deportations for the current year were already down significantly, and that ICE agents would have to focus their efforts on more than criminal aliens in order to meet the agency’s goal of 400,000 removals this year. Id. The memo has attracted attention not only for the rare statement of ICE enforcement goals in explicit terms, but because Chaparro – who was also a senior Homeland Security Official under President Bush – also provided a road map to help agents deport more illegal aliens.
Unfortunately, instead of defending the appropriate expansion of removal activities, ICE spokesman Brian P. Hale was quick to distance DHS leaders from it. “Portions of the memo were inconsistent with ICE, inconsistent with the administration’s point of view and inconsistent with the secretary,” said Hale. Id. Morton also released a statement that the memo was issued without his authorization, adding, “We are strongly committed to carrying out our priorities to remove serious criminal offenders first and we definitively do not set quotas.” (The Los Angeles Times, March 31, 2010). Morton is under fire from amnesty activists who are calling for his removal because they view the memo as “a clear violation” of his previous statements. According to the Center for Community Change, “ICE has gone rogue and needs to be reined in with dramatic action.” Id.
The news that immigration officials could be committed to actually enforcing the law has been met with disbelief and intense anger from amnesty advocates, leading Morton to promise that the memo had been “withdrawn and corrected.” Chaparro also released a new memo clarifying that his earlier statement “signals no shift in the important steps we have taken to date to focus our priorities on the smart and effective enforcement of immigration laws, prioritizing dangerous criminal aliens…while also adhering to Congressional mandates to maintain an average daily [detention] population and meet annual performance measures.” (The Washington Post, March 27, 2010). Interestingly, Chaparro did not alter or rescind any of the strategies he had previously outlined to combat the sharp decline of deportations.
written by Eee Zee
President Obama once again demonstrated his allegiance to pro-amnesty organizations by appointing a union lawyer to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) who opposes employer sanctions for hiring illegal aliens. President Obama appointed Craig Becker to the NLRB last week as part of a series of recess appointments to fill 15 administration positions, a move that upset Republicans who argued the president circumvented the Senate’s authority to confirm nominations. (The Wall Street Journal, March 29, 2010). Though both parties agree that most of the nominees are not controversial, the appointment of Becker to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has sparked fierce opposition.
The main controversy comes from public comments Mr. Becker has made on employer sanctions for hiring illegal aliens. In a 2001 radio interview on WBEZ, Becker publicly stated that he opposes sanctioning employers for hiring illegal aliens. (Breitbart, January 8, 2001). Calling the impact of employer sanctions “discriminatory” and “harsh,” Becker said the policy of imposing sanctions ignored the fact that illegal aliens are here to stay. Becker’s nomination, which has been pending for about a year, has also been controversial because he is the associate general counsel of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and also works for the AFL-CIO, both of which support amnesty and spend millions of dollars advocating for such legislation. Many feel that his history creates a conflict of interest because the NLRB oversees union elections and referees disputes between employers and unions. Opponents of Becker’s nomination feel he won’t be impartial.
Both Democrats and Republicans feel Becker’s radical positions should disqualify him from the position at the NLRB. Only two months ago, the Senate blocked Becker’s appointment through a filibuster. At that time, Senator Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) remarked, “Mr. Becker’s previous statements strongly indicate that he would take an aggressive personal agenda to the NLRB, and that he would pursue a personal agenda there, rather than that of the administration. This is of great concern, considering that the board’s main responsibility is to resolve labor disputes with an even and impartial hand.” (Politico, February 8, 2010). In fact, the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation has already said it will ask Becker to recuse himself from 12 pending cases due to his prior opposition to the group. (The Wall Street Journal, March 29, 2010).
Obama’s decision to appoint Becker is a huge win for labor unions. The Workforce Fairness Institute, which is funded by business owners, called Becker’s appointment a “payoff to union bosses at the expense of America’s employers and employees.” (CBS News, March 29, 2010). While union advocacy groups such as American Rights at Work celebrate, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce warns, “the business community should be on red alert for radical changes that could significantly impair the ability of America’s job creators to compete.” (CBS News, March 29, 2010).
written by Eee Zee
The San Francisco Chronicle reports that three Muslim cousins have been arrested for shooting a dozen people in one night with a BB gun, believing they were homosexual.
The three suspects, Mohammad Habibzada, Shafiq Hashemi, and Sayed Bassam, allegedly drove up next to one victim and videotaped shooting him in the race. He reported the attack to law enforcement, which then arrested the group.The victim refused medical treatment and did not suffer serious injury.
The videotape that was recorded showed attacks on 11 other males that same night, although the report did not say whether they were also suspected of being homosexuals by the attackers. They were released after paying bail but re-arrested when they showed up in court for the additional crimes seen.
The only victim to come forward denies being gay and said in court that what makes the attack “even a little sillier … they were out shooting for gay guys and they didn’t get one,” according to the Bay Area Reporter.
Islam, like Judaism and Christianity, takes a firm stance against homosexuality. In some Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia and Iran, the lifestyle is outlawed, punishable by imprisonment or even execution.
A Pew Research Center study in 2007 found that 61% of American-Muslims felt that homosexuality should be discouraged, as opposed to 51% of the overall American population that believes it should be accepted.
written by Eee Zee
On March 26, federal authorities arrested Raja Lahrasib Khan, a taxi cab driver in Chicago born in Pakistan for allegedly having ties to Al-Qaeda and planning to bomb a stadium, The Washington Post reports.
Khan has been tied to Ilyas Kashmiri, a high-level Al-Qaeda operative in Pakistan who recruited another Chicago Muslim for a plot to kill the author of cartoons in Sweden mocking Mohammed. Recently, two American women were arrested as part of a larger plot to kill the same author.
The court papers state that Khan was recorded describing a plot to attack a U.S. stadium in August, describing the sound of the explosives as “boom, boom, boom, boom.”
The India Times reports that an FBI sting operation helped lead to Khan’s arrest. He told an undercover agent that he met with Ilyas Kashmiri in 2008 in northwestern Pakistan. Khan is also accused of planning to give money to Kashmiri. FoxNews.com says that Khan told the agent that he has known Kashmiri for 15 years.
Khan also said that Kashmiri told him that Osama Bin Laden is in good health and is still acting in a leadership capacity, according to OneIndia News.
“…these charges, once again, affirm that law enforcement must remain constantly vigilant to guard against domestic support of foreign terrorist organizations,” a statement from U.S. Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald reads.
written by Eee Zee
The Quilliam Foundation, a moderate Muslim organization in the United Kingdom, has accused the country’s Islam Channel of promoting extremism, prompting an investigation by the Office of Communications, The National reports.
“A number of presenters with extremist tendencies were regularly given the opportunity to air their opinions on the network without a challenge from more moderate Islamic voices,” the Quilliam Foundation’s report states.
It also accused the network of sexism by instructing women not to leave their homes without a male chaperone and the permission of her husband. On one program, a guest said that a woman should never refuse to engage in sexual activity with her husband.
The Foundation also criticized a program called IslamiQA, where viewers were told that “the majority of people in hell will be women” because of their negative affects on society.
“Although the channel does not directly call for terrorist violence, it clearly helps to create an atmosphere in which religiously-sanctioned intolerance and even hatred might be seen as acceptable,” Talal Rajab, the author of the report, told This Is London.
The channel has also been criticized for having links to Anwar al-Awlaki, an American-born imam currently in Yemen working for Al-Qaeda. Al-Awlaki is believed to have had a role in the Fort Hood shooting in November and the underwear bomb plot on Christmas Day.
The Guardian reported on January 24 that the leader of the channel is wanted in Tunisia on terrorism charges and that their website had links to several sermons of al-Awlaki, including one titled “It is a War Against Islam.” The links were removed after attention was brought to them.
Islam Channel was launched in 2004 and nearly 60% of British-Muslims are said to watch the program regularly. It is currently the most popular Muslim network in the United Kingdom.
written by Eee Zee
A 15-year old Muslim student in France attacked his teacher with teargas after describing the Al-Qaeda organization as a “terrorist group,” Agence France-Presse reports.
The history teacher, who asked that their name not be disclosed, said they were reading from the textbook about Al-Qaeda’s role in the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States.
“He stood up and declared that al-Qaeda is not terrorist and that neither is the Taliban,” before activating the teargas can, the teacher told the Agence France-Presse.
The report said that a criminal complaint has been filed against the student. He is reported by The Mirror in the United Kingdom of being of North African descent.
The Atlas Shrugs blog has linked to a video of the attack recorded by a cell phone that was obtained by a French news station. The student is seen aggressively approaching the teacher, who falls down on the ground screaming. The teacher appears to trip over the student’s leg when he tries to corner her, although it is unclear if he was deliberately trying to make her fall.
“Western Europe has major immigration coming in from North Africa, and these primarily Muslim immigrants often form their own communities inside the country,” explains Ryan Mauro, the Christian Action Network’s National Security Advisor.
“This lack of assimilation is a significant factor in the growth of extremist religious ideology that justifies such violence.”
According to Islam expert Daniel Pipes, there are 751 “no-go” zones in France that are mostly Muslim and are not actively controlled by the government or law enforcement.
written by Eee Zee
One would wonder why Hasan did not find his way to Afghanistan or Irag and fight for his beliefs? Could it be that being is the United States is a heck of a lot more comfortable than being in those tribal based hell-holes with people bent on converting all infidels to Islam and hating Jews for all the wrong reasons?
Could it be that even without universal healthcare, cap and trade, unionization of everything, hope and change, returning to a welfare society, converting to a nanny state and the Obama socialism, this is the greatest country on the face of the earth. I know that every immigrant from European countries I know constantly remark that we are the greatest and that we don’t realize how great we are. And that was before the Messiah was elected president.
Could it be that the bigger goal of these Islamic Jihadists is to infiltrate this country and take us down from within, one step at a time; taking a century if it takes that long? There is no doubt that due to our political correctness this is an easier way to conquer us than on the battlefield. They now know without a doubt that we will look the other way or that they can hide behind our constitution if need be to avoid either detection or expulsion.
The Sean Connery character in the movie “The Wind and the Lion” said it 30 years ago to the Brit he had kidnapped; “the sands are forever”, meaning that they have forever to convert all infidels to Islam. It is not a stretch to envision that amongst the approximate 8,000,000 Muslims now in the United States that there are thousands if not hundreds of thousands that think just like Nidal Malik Hasan. They read the Qur’an literally as do the Imam’s in their mosques preaching hate toward us infidels. And in their world THERE IS NO FREEDOM FROM RELIGION!
Political correctness will be our death! You have to look no further than the aftermath of this incident. The four liberal networks, NBC, CBS, ABC and CNN would not even call this a terrorist act and immediately began spreading lunatic ideas like Major Hasan was under stress leading to his meltdown. The Messiah in a speech he made after commandeering the networks led with the mythic oppression of Native Americans rather than the issue at hand. The hundreds of liberals coming forth to assert that this incident had nothing to do with Islam is just typical of us putting our heads in the sand.
In addition, these Islamic Jihadist whackos mostly look like normal people making it easy for them to hide amongst us. Nidal Malik Hasan attended high school in Roanoke, Va., studied biochemistry at Virginia Tech, played sports, didn’t get into any trouble, and appeared to be a normal, well-adjusted individual. He was a psychiatry resident at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington and was apparently working at Fort Hood during the pre-deployment process for soldiers.
I guess his statement as he was shooting people of “Allahu akbar” (Allah is the greatest!) and the business cards he had in his apartment with the “Soldiers of Allah” imprint, or something to that effect, were not enough for the Messiah and the liberal press to call a spade a spade. Kind of like arguing with a liberal, facts don’t matter to them!
written by Eee Zee
Federal officials will release more details on a series of raids this weekend against Hutaree. As of right now, it appears the FBI raided the militant Christian group based on leads they were preparing to attack Muslim Americans.
Gee, if I remember right just a few months, the FBI and other federal agencies were tracking Major Nidal Malik Hasan, who had radical Islamic ties and then ended up shooting up the Fort Hood army post in Texas. During that attack, the federal government did their damndest to cover Hasan’s Islamic ties while choosing not to immediately to prevent Hasan’s actions knowing he was a threat.
Why did they act this way? Oh, because the feds were scared of discriminating against Muslims and the possible backlash if they took him in before he had the opportunity to attack Foot Hood.
So is the lesson here in 2010 in Barack’s America, that if you are a Christian preparing for a holy war, the federal government will provide preventive measures to stop any future actions, but if you are a Muslim and preparing for jihad in the United States, they will allow you to carry out your actions and then arrest you to avoid any Islamic backlash? I mean, that’s what I am taking from this today.
By the way, I don’t advocate either of the actions of either Hutaree or Hasan. I just think the FBI’s decision making should be examined closely.
written by Eee Zee
|