Islam + Illegals + Obama = Death to the U.S.A

The mainstream media would have us believe that the violence and lawlessness have nothing whatsoever to do with race or ethnicity, but are a result of… Well, maybe poverty. Or the economic crisis. Or the lack of opportunity for members of the underclass.

Or, better yet: the real culprit is white racism.

For the past few decades there has been a slow but consistent shift of how we are expected to view culpability. Most likely because of the memes invented and implanted by the Frankfurt School, but if that is too conspiratorial for us, then just a slow natural shift perhaps due to the raw affluence of our capitalist successes and consequent wealth, leading to extravagances of thought, the idea that we are so much better than everyone else, we must actually be more responsible than everyone else.

The shift of course is one of moving away from anti-racism to genuine racism and calling it anti-racism. This happens in lots of ways but the most repugnant is:

The deliberate suppression of any information about racism towards white people, including the sanitization of history in order to make it appear as if only white Europeans are capable of agency and that all other people are acting ‘naturally’ in some manner.

This would be the racism of lower expectations. That non-white people somehow cannot help being what they are, so we must celebrate their cultures at the expense of our own, while simultaneously making our own cultures repugnant to us as well as, in many cases, actually illegal. (Smoking in bars very illegal, hookah in kebab joints, a proud symbol of multiculturalism) We look at our own culture as being a function of choice so we can make our own religions illegal, our habits and vices, (unless they are seen to annoy conservatives) while violating all our own conceptions of natural human rights to accommodate the most primitive cultures we can find and then pay them to live among us, while they break our laws and customs with malice and contempt for all we have created.

written by Eee Zee

A massacre in a church in Baghdad and the Oklahoma vote against Shariah law. To the average American, these two events could not possibility be connected in any way, shape or form.

Yet the attack upon Christians, not only in the church of Our Lady of Salvation in Baghdad on October 31 but also in Nigeria, Indonesia, Algeria, Egypt and elsewhere, is a form of Islamic interpretation of Shariah.

Islamic Jihad (which President Obama refused to define let alone condemn when asked about it in Mumbai recently) dictates that if an infidel refuses to convert to what jihadists perceive as the “one and only true religion,” then killing them is a virtue.

This is part of the strict Islamic interpretation of the Shariah. And it is this Shariah law that many Muslim jihadists in Europe and the United States want to see as part and parcel of court proceedings in the West.

Fair-minded Westerners may ask, “What’s wrong with that?”

Simply put, it is the camel’s nose under the tent (which is also a mode of Shariah interpretation). First, it is allowing the Shariah to be applied by judges when they are ruling in Muslim cases. This ultimately will lead to full-blown acceptance, or should I say imposition, of Shariah law upon ALL Western citizens.

Far fetched?

When Muslims invaded former Christian lands in North Africa, the jihadists said they were coming only as liberators from the bad Romans. This referred of course to the Byzantines, or the eastern part of the Roman Empire. But within a few decades, the camel that put his nose under the tent took over the tent, and today there are hardly any Christians left in that part of the world. They were methodically and systematically forced to convert or eliminated.

Islamic lobbying groups successfully found a politically correct judge to bring an injunction against the will of the Oklahoman people, who voted 70 percent against the use of Shariah law in their state courts.

Oklahomans saw what is happening in New Jersey and elsewhere. Judges are using the Shariah to allow Muslim men to abuse their wives (a practice that is not only permitted but encouraged in the Islamic world), and citizens of the Sooner State wanted to be pro-active. But alas, the politically correct courts (who in my opinion will help bring about the demise of Western civilization) are overruling the will of the people.

Oklahomans and citizens of every other state should not be left exposed by the federal government. Had we been so blessed to have a federal government committed to defending the rights of 98 percent of Americans, it would have taken the initiative to guarantee that there are no cracks in U.S. law that could lead to another Baghdad-type massacre — perhaps on American soil. The people of this great nation must be strong enough and smart enough to stop the camel from sticking its nose under our tent.

written by Eee Zee

PHOENIX — A Glendale optometrist’s year-long legal fight over what services he had to provide for a Spanish speaking customer is going to help provide new protections to other businesses.

Gov. Jan Brewer has signed legislation spelling out that nothing in state law requires businesses to provide “trained and competent'' interpreters when a customer comes in speaking a language other than English.

Assistant Attorney General Michael Walker said that’s probably always been the law. But that didn’t stop John Schrolucke from having to spend time and money defending himself and his dental practice before Walker’s office finally dismissed the case.

Schrolucke told lawmakers the whole incident stems from a woman speaking only Spanish who came into his office.

Schrolucke said the woman did bring her 12-year-old child with her. But he said allowing the child to interpret for the parent would have gotten him into legal trouble.

Potentially more significant, Schrolucke said he faced a potential malpractice lawsuit if the child did not properly translate some of the more technical explanations being provided.

So he turned the woman away, telling her through her child to come back with someone at least 18 years old. Schrolucke said he also gave the woman the option of going to one of two other optometrists who speak Spanish.

Instead, he said, the woman filed a discrimination complaint with the Attorney General’s Office.

State law prohibits discrimination in places of “public accommodation against anyone because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or ancestry.” That category includes restaurants, hotels, theaters and any place that offers services or goods to the general public.

Schrolucke said he was given an option to settle. But that would have required him — and anyone who bought his business — to provide interpreters and documents in Spanish, something he said would set a bad precedent for not only his operation but other small businesses.

A year after the complaint was filed it was dismissed after the Attorney General’s Office concluded there had been no civil rights violation.

But that wasn’t the end of it. Upset with the whole process, Schrolucke approached Sen. John Huppenthal, R-Chandler, who agreed to sponsor what he called “clarifying language to the state’s civil rights law.

“Nobody should be treated like this”  Huppenthal said.

“It’s nightmare to go through this,” the senator continued. “He was drug through the mud by us,” saying what happened was “really, in a sense, despicable but most certainly unfortunate.”

Walker, who is the litigation chief of the civil rights division, offered his own apology “for what does occasionally end up as state bureaucratic confusion.”

But Walker told lawmakers that his agency is legally obligated to investigate complaints of discrimination. He said the system worked — eventually — when the complaint was dismissed.

Huppenthal introduced identical legislation last year. While it was approved by a Senate panel it never made it to the full Senate floor.

written by Eee Zee